AdAge: Broadcasting not Important, say panelists

Doesn't fit in a category? It does now.
Post Reply
Baylink
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:21 pm

AdAge: Broadcasting not Important, say panelists

Post by Baylink » Mon Apr 22, 2013 11:12 am

It's probably unsurprising that I don't agree with them, but I come to the opinion from the IP side of the world; non-isochronous network schemes (ie: all of them) are not especially efficient or rugged ways to move broadcast-quality video around.

"He's heading in, Curt; he's at the 40, the 30, the 20, the 10... [buffering]"

http://broadcastengineering.com/cable-a ... television

Edit: URL tags corrected.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests